PublicTrust Social Work
Menu

Independent. Not a government website.

How ratings work

What we ask, who can answer, how scores are calculated, and what we can't check.

What we ask

For children's services in England, we ask about honesty, records, use of power, involvement, getting help, safety, complaints and care. The form has six sections. It covers everyday contact as well as serious failures, and includes questions that apply only to particular experiences.

Social Work England's professional standards apply to registered social workers in England. We use them to inform questions about people's experience of a council's service. This questionnaire is independent, is not endorsed by Social Work England, and does not determine whether a standard was breached.

Answer from direct experience. "Unable to assess" means the question does not apply or you do not know enough to answer. It is excluded from scores. If something was needed but never happened, use the lowest answer rather than "Unable to assess".

Children's services in England · 36 questions

Honesty, records and decisions · 6 questions
  1. 1

    Was the service honest and truthful with you?

    Think about what you were told, what you could check, and whether important information was withheld or misrepresented.

    Related SWE standards 2.1

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  2. 2

    Did records you saw accurately reflect what was said and what happened?

    Consider reports, assessments and meeting notes, including missing context or words wrongly attributed to you. If you saw no records, choose unable to assess.

    Related SWE standards 3.11, 5.3

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  3. 3

    Did the service make clear what was fact, what was an allegation and what was its opinion?

    Consider whether disputed or unverified information was presented as established fact in discussions or reports.

    Related SWE standards 3.2, 3.5, 3.11

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  4. 4

    Did the service properly respond when you challenged information in your records?

    Consider whether it checked the issue, corrected factual errors or recorded your disagreement and explained its response. Use unable to assess if you challenged nothing.

    Related SWE standards 3.11, 6.3

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  5. 5

    Did the service consider relevant evidence before making decisions?

    Include evidence you provided, your family's strengths and other possible explanations, including information that challenged the service's initial view.

    Related SWE standards 1.1, 3.2, 3.5, 3.7

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  6. 6

    Did the service explain the reasons for decisions affecting your family?

    Think about whether the concerns, options and consequences were clear before you were asked to agree to a plan or sign something.

    Related SWE standards 2.1, 2.4, 3.11

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
Power, fairness and your circumstances · 6 questions
  1. 7

    Was the service's use of its powers proportionate to the concerns?

    Consider the reasons for restrictions, pressure to agree and whether less disruptive options were explored. You do not need to judge legality.

    Related SWE standards 1.7

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  2. 8

    Did the service treat you fairly, without discrimination?

    Consider treatment related to race, religion, sex, sexuality, disability or family background, including stereotypes and prejudiced assumptions.

    Related SWE standards 1.5, 2.1, 5.1

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  3. 9

    Did the service adapt how it worked to your family's communication or disability needs?

    Examples include interpreters, accessible information, extra time, sensory needs, learning disability and neurodivergence. Choose unable to assess if no adaptation was needed.

    Related SWE standards 1.5, 2.4, 2.5

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  4. 10

    Did the service distinguish financial or housing difficulties from concerns about how you cared for your child?

    Think about whether lack of money or suitable housing was understood in context. Use unable to assess if this was not part of your experience.

    Related SWE standards 1.5, 1.6, 3.14

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  5. 11

    Did the service take account of domestic abuse and coercive control when responding to your family?

    Consider the safety of the child and the person experiencing abuse, and whether responsibility was placed on the person causing harm. Use unable to assess if not relevant.

    Related SWE standards 3.2, 3.4, 3.12

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  6. 12

    Did the service handle your family's private information with care?

    Think about who information was shared with and whether the reasons were explained. Necessary safeguarding information-sharing does not always require consent.

    Related SWE standards 2.2, 2.6

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
The child and family having a say · 6 questions
  1. 13

    Did the service take the child's wishes and feelings seriously?

    Answer from what you observed. Consider whether the child's views influenced planning, with reasons given when a different decision was made.

    Related SWE standards 1.2, 2.5

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  2. 14

    Did the social worker spend enough time with the child to understand their everyday life?

    Think about direct contact, trust and communication suited to the child, including opportunities to speak privately where appropriate.

    Related SWE standards 1.1, 2.4, 2.5

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  3. 15

    Were you meaningfully involved in decisions affecting your family?

    Consider whether you could contribute before decisions were made, rather than only being told what had already been decided.

    Related SWE standards 1.3, 2.4

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  4. 16

    Were you given the information you needed in time to prepare for important meetings?

    Include relevant reports, the meeting's purpose and a chance to respond to concerns. Choose unable to assess if no meeting took place.

    Related SWE standards 2.1, 2.4

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  5. 17

    Did the service help you or the child access independent advice or advocacy when needed?

    Think about help to understand options, speak up or challenge a decision. Choose unable to assess if independent support was not needed.

    Related SWE standards 1.2, 3.13, 6.3

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  6. 18

    Did the service properly consider safe support from relatives or other people important to the child?

    Include family meetings and potential kinship carers, taking account of the child's wishes and safety. Choose unable to assess if this did not arise.

    Related SWE standards 1.2, 1.4, 1.7

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
Getting help and reliable support · 6 questions
  1. 19

    Did the service respond to requests for assessment or help without avoidable delay?

    Think about waiting for an assessment, being passed between teams or having to reach a crisis before receiving a response.

    Related SWE standards 2.1, 3.13

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  2. 20

    Did the support agreed in your plan actually happen?

    Consider agreed visits, referrals, services or funding, and whether anyone followed up when these did not happen. Use unable to assess if no support was agreed.

    Related SWE standards 2.1, 3.13

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  3. 21

    Did the service help your family get practical support that matched your needs?

    Examples include disability support, short breaks, therapeutic help, parenting support and help for adoptive or kinship families. Rate support from children's services.

    Related SWE standards 1.3, 3.3, 3.13

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  4. 22

    Could you reach someone who took responsibility when you needed a response?

    Consider returned calls, cover during absence and knowing who to contact when a matter was urgent.

    Related SWE standards 2.1, 3.8

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  5. 23

    When workers changed, did your family's support continue smoothly?

    Think about gaps in support, handovers, repeating your history and rebuilding trust. Choose unable to assess if no worker changed.

    Related SWE standards 2.1, 3.9, 3.11

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  6. 24

    Did children's services work effectively with other services involved with your family?

    Include schools, health, mental health, housing or SEND teams. Consider conflicting plans and gaps between services. Use unable to assess if only one service was involved.

    Related SWE standards 3.6, 3.9, 3.13

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
Safety, complaints and putting things right · 6 questions
  1. 25

    Did the service act promptly on concerns about the child's safety?

    Include harm at home, in care, online or in the community, including exploitation and concerns about professionals. Choose unable to assess if no safety concern arose.

    Related SWE standards 3.4, 3.12, 6.1

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  2. 26

    Did the service make it straightforward to raise a concern or complaint?

    Think about clear routes, help to complain and being able to reach the next stage. Choose unable to assess if you did not try to raise a concern.

    Related SWE standards 6.3

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  3. 27

    Did the service take your concerns or complaints seriously?

    Consider whether it examined the issues you raised and gave a reasoned response. A complaint need not be upheld to be handled properly. Use unable to assess if none was raised.

    Related SWE standards 6.3

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  4. 28

    Did your complaint progress within the timescales you were given?

    Consider repeated extensions, unexplained silence or having to chase each stage. Choose unable to assess if you made no complaint or no response is due yet.

    Related SWE standards 2.1, 6.3

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  5. 29

    Were you treated fairly after raising a concern or complaint?

    Think about whether speaking up led to threats, being labelled difficult or reduced support. Choose unable to assess if you raised no concern.

    Related SWE standards 5.5

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  6. 30

    When the service accepted that something had gone wrong, did it take the action it promised?

    Consider agreed corrections, apologies, replacement support or changes to practice. Use unable to assess if no mistake was acknowledged or action is not due yet.

    Related SWE standards 2.1, 6.3

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
Care and moving into adulthood · 6 questions
  1. 31

    Did the care arranged for the child meet their individual needs?

    For foster care, residential care or supported accommodation: consider safety, disability, health, education, identity and location. Choose unable to assess if not relevant.

    Related SWE standards 1.1, 1.2, 3.13, 3.14

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  2. 32

    Did the service protect the child from avoidable disruption when arranging or changing their care?

    Think about repeated moves, notice, preparation and continuity of school and relationships. An urgent move may be needed for safety. Use unable to assess if not relevant.

    Related SWE standards 1.2, 1.7, 3.14

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  3. 33

    Did the service support agreed, safe contact with people important to the child?

    Include siblings, parents, relatives and friends, practical arrangements and explanations for changes. Choose unable to assess if contact arrangements were not involved.

    Related SWE standards 1.2, 1.4

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  4. 34

    Did the service give carers the information and support they needed to care for the child?

    For foster, kinship or adoptive carers: include preparation, advice, respite and agreed financial support. Choose unable to assess if not relevant.

    Related SWE standards 1.4, 3.9, 3.13

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  5. 35

    Did reviews of the child's care lead to action on the issues raised?

    Think about whether reviews checked progress, listened to the child and led to follow-up. Choose unable to assess if you had no direct experience of reviews.

    Related SWE standards 1.2, 2.4, 3.9

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess
  6. 36

    Did the service prepare the young person for moving into adulthood with the support they needed?

    Include leaving care or moving to adult services: housing, finances, education, health and a trusted contact. Choose unable to assess if this stage was not reached.

    Related SWE standards 1.2, 3.6, 3.13, 3.14

    • 1 Never
    • 2 Rarely
    • 3 Sometimes
    • 4 Usually
    • 5 Always
    • Unable to assess

Other services, including children's services in Wales · 5 questions

Communication and involvement · 5 questions
  1. 1

    How clearly did the service explain its role?

    • 1 Very unclearly
    • 2 Unclearly
    • 3 Partly clearly
    • 4 Clearly
    • 5 Very clearly
    • Unable to assess
  2. 2

    How clearly did the service explain decisions affecting you?

    • 1 Very unclearly
    • 2 Unclearly
    • 3 Partly clearly
    • 4 Clearly
    • 5 Very clearly
    • Unable to assess
  3. 3

    How well did the service listen to your views?

    • 1 Very poorly
    • 2 Poorly
    • 3 Partly
    • 4 Well
    • 5 Very well
    • Unable to assess
  4. 4

    How respectfully did the service communicate with you?

    • 1 Very disrespectfully
    • 2 Disrespectfully
    • 3 Mixed
    • 4 Respectfully
    • 5 Very respectfully
    • Unable to assess
  5. 5

    How easy was it to understand the next steps in dealing with the service?

    • 1 Very difficult
    • 2 Difficult
    • 3 Neither easy nor difficult
    • 4 Easy
    • 5 Very easy
    • Unable to assess

We don't ask people to judge legal compliance, and a decision someone disagrees with doesn't necessarily mean poor practice.

What informed the questions

The questions draw on professional standards, national guidance and issues identified through inspections, complaints and children's advocacy. These sources help us choose what to ask; they do not establish how often a problem happens or whether it happened in a particular council.

This is an independent questionnaire, not a validated survey or an official measure of compliance. We keep its wording and scoring under review with people who have used children's services.

Who can rate

  • Adults who had direct involvement with the service: people who received support, and parents or carers who were directly involved.
  • People rate their own experience only. Colleagues, people paid or rewarded to rate, and second-hand accounts are not counted.
  • One active rating per person for each service, covering every year of their experience. Changing your mind means withdrawing and rating again, not adding votes.

What we check

Accounts have confirmed an email address and declared direct involvement. Involvement has not been independently verified.

An email account isn't the same as one person, and we don't treat it that way. Every rating is checked before it counts, and unusual patterns are held for a closer look. Negative ratings are never held just for being negative.

Email addresses from councils, children's services trusts, public services such as the NHS and the police, and charities that work with families can't be used to rate. Ratings sent from a network where someone tried one of those addresses are checked more closely.

How scores are calculated

  • Everyone who rates carries equal weight.
  • Each person's overall figure is the average of the questions they answered. "Unable to assess" is left out; it counts as neither zero nor five.
  • To count toward the overall score, a rating needs at least 3 questions answered. You do not need experience of every area, such as care or complaints, to rate the service.
  • Each question's result uses only the answers to that question.
  • Different questionnaire versions are not combined. Earlier answers stay attached to their original questions and do not count towards the new questionnaire's scores.
  • An overall average can hide a serious concern in one area. Read the individual results and their answer counts alongside it.
  • Scores are rounded to 1 decimal place at the final step only.
  • Until a service has several ratings, its score is steadied towards the middle: we add 2 imaginary ratings of 3 out of 5 to the average. One very negative or very positive rating can't decide the score on its own, but still moves it the same way, and the effect fades as more people rate. Question results aren't steadied.
  • Worker names given privately never change a score and never create a score for a worker.

Formula version: experience-v4

When a score appears

rating needed for a score
1
answers needed for a question's result
3
questions answered for a rating to count
3

A question's result waits for a few answers because one person's full set of answers could show who they are. Where there aren't enough ratings, we say so. A missing score is never shown as zero.

How results are worded

These bands describe the reported experience, not the quality of the service.

  • 3.5 out of 5

    Mostly positive experiences reported

    Scores of 3.5 and above

  • 2.5 out of 5

    Mixed experiences reported

    Scores from 2.5 to 3.4

  • 1.0 out of 5

    Mostly negative experiences reported

    Scores from 1.0 to 2.4

Official inspections

Inspection outcomes appear separately from community ratings, exactly as the inspectorate published them. Each nation and service has its own inspectorate and framework, so we never convert one grade into another or combine them with community scores.

Children's services in England: Ofsted

Ofsted inspects every English council's children's services. Each inspection gives an overall effectiveness grade, and a grade for leadership, for children who need help and protection, for children in care and, since 2023, for care leavers. There are four grades:

  • Outstanding. The highest grade.
  • Good. The standard Ofsted expects every council to meet.
  • Requires improvement to be good. Not yet good, although Ofsted found no widespread or serious failures leaving children harmed or at risk of harm.
  • Inadequate. Widespread or serious failures leave children harmed or at risk of harm. Ofsted then makes regular monitoring visits.

Councils graded good or outstanding usually have a shorter inspection next time. Between inspections, Ofsted makes focused visits to look at one area of practice. Visits don't give grades: Ofsted publishes a letter setting out what it found.

Grades come from Ofsted's official statistics, which Ofsted updates once a year. Every week we check GOV.UK for a new release, and check each council's page on Ofsted's website for new reports and visit letters. If Ofsted has published an inspection report that its statistics don't include yet, the council's page says so and links to it. Reports stay on Ofsted's website: we link to them rather than copying them.

Wales

Care Inspectorate Wales inspects council social services in Wales. It doesn't give councils an overall grade, so each Welsh council's page lists its reports instead, linked to Care Inspectorate Wales's website. We check for new ones every week.

Workers

Pages rate the council or trust's service, not individual people. You can name a worker privately when you rate. That name isn't published or counted, and it isn't treated as proof that the person was involved.

Corrections and withdrawals

You can withdraw your own rating, or delete your whole account, at any time from your account page, and the score is recalculated without it. To report something that's wrong, contact us. While we check a reported problem, a score may be temporarily hidden.